Editor’s Note: Before getting into my thoughts riding this fork, I want to open by stating that this wasn’t a review I took lightly.
I’m an early adopter personality, meaning I love trying new things and tinkering, regardless of whether or not it’s “cool.” That said, during the review period I kept thinking whether or not I would spend my hard earned money on a linkage fork opposed to a traditional fork. In other words, was the anti-squat and sensitivity such a big improvement in performance that it justified the increase in weight, cost, complexity and let’s be honest— poor looks.
I tested this fork on both a familiar bike of my own, and on the gearbox rig pictured above. For several months, I rode it on my home trails, jumps and rocky Los Angeles terrain. If there was ever a place this fork would show direct benefits, it’s on the loose and rocky trails I typically ride since any increase in time the front wheel spends on the ground means an improvement in traction.
While Motion will state that the fork has unmatched sensitivity, on the trail it felt ever a bit more sensitive than a well tuned and freshly serviced Fox 36 with a coil swap. Not a night and day difference, but most definitely perceivable.
Where I noticed a more pronounced, tangible improvement however, was in large, square edge impacts. The fork is able to move away from and over an obstacle with far less feedback to the rider than a traditional fork because of the axle path. Thanks to the rearward path of the linkage, the fork is able to move up and backward when it hits a square edge. No telescopic fork can achieve that level of impact absorption due to the design issues inherent in how they function. It truly is impressive.
That means my ability to carry momentum, especially on technical climbs and entering technical sections of trail were much faster and easier. This fork also has an incredibly bottomless feel. I’m a dirt jump rat, and enjoy sending it on bikes. Whether I was catching backside, or even hucking to flat, hard landings where I could see the rubber bump stops contact, I never felt a harsh bottom out.
By far the most notable feature of this fork however is the anti-squat characteristics. For my entire riding career of 15 years, I’ve only known forks that dive under rider weight when braking or loading the front end. It took some getting used to when the E18 stayed right at the top of the travel no matter where I shifted my weight.
The bike’s geometry stays consistent through berms, g-outs or any other situation where a traditional fork’s dive would have your headtube angle steepening drastically. It’s not a trivial difference, and it does inspire confidence in steep terrain since it lets you shift your weight farther to the front of the bike, improving traction. If you’re looking for definitive and measureable improvements as a reason to switch from a telescoping fork, the E18 offers them.
There are downsides however, with the primary being weight. At 4.85 pounds, this fork is about half a pound heavier than a Fox Factory 36. Whether it’s in my head or not, the fact that mass is spread out over a larger area seems to influence the ride of the bike, and make the front end feel ever so slightly more sluggish.
Another issue I had was with the damper. While Motion remedied the initial topping out issue the fork experienced with an on-the-fly design change to the damper, I found the controls extremely hard to use. The rotating collar that allows for adjustment was very hard to turn and felt unintuitive. I also missed the ability to fine tune high and low speed compression and rebound. However, I did like the easy adjustment of spring preload, since it let me fine tune for rider weight changes like wearing a pack just like I would with an air spring fork. Motion has informed us that the remedy would improve some of my complaints.
At $1,250 the E18 isn’t cheap, but isn’t that far off from other high-end offerings by Fox or Cane Creek. It also offers distinct and unique performance benefits that can’t be matched by traditional forks. Motion put years of work into this fork, and we love small companies that take a risk to do things differently. There’s some impressive technology in this fork, and some clever ideas that really work. While the performance benefits are decidedly better, those benefit have to outweigh the downsides. Ultimately whether those gains are worth the weight and aesthetic penalty is up to you, but, regardless of what you decide, if you get a chance to try one of these forks out, we highly suggest you give it a try.
Weight: 4.85 lbs